• Welcome to Camera Craniums: The Photography Community for Enthusiasts.
 

Recent Posts

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 62,507
  • Total Topics: 5,734
  • Online today: 2,622
  • Online ever: 3,332 (December 26, 2025, 05:27:02 PM)
Users Online
  • Users: 0
  • Guests: 978
  • Total: 978
  • Baidu
wex
Canon kit to borrow (free...Dreaminess Happy Christmas 2025!NiceVeedi 2-Pack Photogra...DJI Osmo Action 6 Essenti...RØDE Wireless ME Ultra-co...NEEWER Snap On ND Filter ...What made you feel good t...BRDRC Pocket 3 Camera Bik...Lenovo LOQ | 15.6 inch Fu...DJI Mic 3 (2 TX + 1 RX + ...DJI Mic Mini (2 TX + 1 RX...DJI OSMO Action 5 Pro 4 3...DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro Adv...Post your best shots hereAilun Tripod Phone Mount ...

HDR Tip (or cheat)

Started by DigiDiva, October 01, 2013, 12:26:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Karen

I love HDR . I use photomatix. It has a good function which cuts out ghosting

ABERS

The problem that I have with HDR is that it is over used. I have always believed that when HDR is employed it should never be noticed, it is primarily to enable detail to be visible both in areas of highlight and shadow in a particularly contrasty scene.

There are a myriad of filters available that go some way to replicate the sometimes strange effects that arise when HDR is overemployed, but each to his/her own. :tup:

Hinfrance

I agree with Alan, mostly, although as sometimes a little bit of surrealism is not inappropriate.

I tend to find HDR is better for indoor shots, especially in dim old buildings like these.



and



Although actually neither of these are 'real' HDR. They're each from one jpg run through the Redynamix plugin

I am not a fan of the current vogue of over the top 'Harry Potter' processing that I see so many landscapes suffering from.
Howard  My CC Gallery
My Flickr
The theory seems to be that as long as a man is a failure he is one of God's children, but that as soon as he succeeds he is taken over by the Devil. H.L Mencken.

donoreo

Quote from: ABERS on October 02, 2013, 04:22:04 PM
The problem that I have with HDR is that it is over used. I have always believed that when HDR is employed it should never be noticed, it is primarily to enable detail to be visible both in areas of highlight and shadow in a particularly contrasty scene.

There are a myriad of filters available that go some way to replicate the sometimes strange effects that arise when HDR is overemployed, but each to his/her own. :tup:
I prefer my HDR to look real as well.  The concept of HDR was to get a greater range of exposure than what the camera sensor would pick up.  That is, to make it closer to what we can see with our eye.   

hssutton

Quote from: donoreo on October 02, 2013, 05:25:19 PM
Quote from: ABERS on October 02, 2013, 04:22:04 PM
The problem that I have with HDR is that it is over used. I have always believed that when HDR is employed it should never be noticed, it is primarily to enable detail to be visible both in areas of highlight and shadow in a particularly contrasty scene.

There are a myriad of filters available that go some way to replicate the sometimes strange effects that arise when HDR is overemployed, but each to his/her own. :tup:
I prefer my HDR to look real as well.  The concept of HDR was to get a greater range of exposure than what the camera sensor would pick up.  That is, to make it closer to what we can see with our eye.

I'm in full agreement with Don. In the early days of digital I and many other photographers would take 2/3 exposures and manually blend them in Photoshop. This gave us the detail in shadows and highlights without the over processed images we constantly see these days.

Harry

DigiDiva

Quote from: donoreo on October 02, 2013, 02:19:15 PM
Quote from: DigiDiva on October 02, 2013, 12:16:38 PM
I have issues downloading upgrades as my MacPro has an ancient processor and theres not much I can upload. Will have a word with my son ans see what he thinks, he's the IT geek of the family
Yours is a PowerMac G5 (I am assuming a G5 and not a G4), if I recall correctly.  A MacPro is the Intel based version.  I have meant to mention this before as people try to help you but they think you have a different machine when you call it a MacPro and they give incorrect advice.

If I am wrong, just tell me, but I think I recall this from when you got it over on the DCW forums.

I don't have an intel processor. Its another processor the name of which I always forget to the despair of my son. My machine used to be used by the kids show Byker Grove in the editing suite. When Byker Grove was scratched, it ended up at a place called Dene Films which is where my son works. He got me the machine for a really stupid price (£100 I think, maybe £200) when Dene Films upgraded.
Please visit my website @ www.sunderlandwallart.com

Reinardina

"I don't have an intel processor. Its another processor the name of which I always forget to the despair of my son."

A Post-it sticker, with the name of the processor, on the side of the computer, or somewhere close, could solve this problem.
It's worth it, if it saves your son from despair.
__________________
Reinardina.

Beauty is bought by judgment of the eye.
Shakespeare. (Love's Labours Lost.)

Oldboy

Quote from: DigiDiva on October 03, 2013, 07:31:01 AM

I don't have an intel processor. Its another processor the name of which I always forget to the despair of my son. My machine used to be used by the kids show Byker Grove in the editing suite. When Byker Grove was scratched, it ended up at a place called Dene Films which is where my son works. He got me the machine for a really stupid price (£100 I think, maybe £200) when Dene Films upgraded.

Isn't it a ARM processor?  :doh:

donoreo

Quote from: Oldboy on October 03, 2013, 09:08:24 AM
Quote from: DigiDiva on October 03, 2013, 07:31:01 AM

I don't have an intel processor. Its another processor the name of which I always forget to the despair of my son. My machine used to be used by the kids show Byker Grove in the editing suite. When Byker Grove was scratched, it ended up at a place called Dene Films which is where my son works. He got me the machine for a really stupid price (£100 I think, maybe £200) when Dene Films upgraded.

Isn't it a ARM processor?  :doh:
No, it is a PowerPC processor.  Macs used them from the 1990s to mid 2000's.  That is why it is called a PowerMac.  Photo right at the top here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_Macintosh  Apple kept the same design case for their MacPro line when they switched to Intel.  IBM still uses the PowerPC processors (newer and more powerful versions) in their AIX (UNIX) servers. 

DigiDiva

Its a G5 I have, and camera raw 4.0...I need to maybe add a plug in but tried and it didn't work.
Please visit my website @ www.sunderlandwallart.com

This website is proudly hosted on Crocweb Cloud Website Hosting.


Camera Craniums is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Program. This affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on Amazon.