Drone 1Dx Mk3Happiness is.... Entry Th...Happiness is.... Chat Thr...POLL-LOUDWhat made you feel good t...Potato - CHAT 27/06-5/07/...Potato - ENTRIES 27/06-5...LOUD-CHAT-Weekly comp 21-...LOUD-ENTRIES-Weekly comp ...Poll for Drawn from Liter...What annoyed you today?Drawn from Literature - E...Drawn from Literature - C...Flash Player EOL and the ...POLL-SPOON

Author Topic: 4.3million dollars for this  (Read 3064 times)

Offline nickt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
    • nick.thompson photography
« Last Edit: November 12, 2011, 02:14:17 PM by Hinfrance »



Offline irv_b

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1045
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2011, 06:28:58 PM »
Your not alone with that thought Nick!
My Gallery

Don't count the days "Guest," make the days count!.

Offline Oldboy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5381
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2011, 06:36:47 PM »
Think I might have deleted that from my card before I got home!  :doh:

Offline nickt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
    • nick.thompson photography
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2011, 10:41:57 PM »
If you look at some of the photos by Joe Cornish, David Noton et al, you wonder what's going on in the art world. Because this photographer has a 'name', the photo's worth a lot of money. It's just pretentious crap.

skellum

  • Guest
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2011, 11:16:59 PM »
I have two choices here. Either I get straight down to our local River Ribble in the morning ( no need to take all my gear as I am only looking to take a snap so I could use my phone ).
Or I could agree with you and and all the other sane people out there.

There are and always will be some very rich but stupid and gullible people out there.   :knuppel2:

Offline stevebedder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
    • My Flickr Gallery
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2011, 09:33:24 AM »
£4.3 million?? Seriously??

......bit confusing that one

 :doh:


Offline Jonathan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1273
    • PeopleByRyan
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2011, 10:03:07 AM »
We all know who Andreas Gursky is, right?

A doodle by a child and a doodle by Davinci may look very similar - but one has resale value and the other doesn't. Tha gallery just created the value for this picture and could sell it tomorrow for the money they paid.  Or in 5 years for more.  Or after Gursky dies for a lot more.
It's Guest's round

Offline krennon

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 539
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2011, 10:30:17 AM »
wonder how much my Old Groynes shot is worth??? mm sell print fake death sell "undiscovered" print for squillions....
http://www.flickr.com/photos/keithfransella/

"Everything in moderation including moderation" Oscar Wilde

Offline Simple

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 684
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2011, 11:40:08 AM »
What's in a name?
4.3 million dollars apparently :D

Offline greypoint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2011, 12:55:36 PM »
We all know who Andreas Gursky is, right?

he would appear to be someone who produces very large prints......sort of like a billboard advert I suppose....another gap in my knowledge plugged  ::)

Offline Jonathan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1273
    • PeopleByRyan
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2011, 02:09:45 PM »
Um yeah.  So all of these pictures are worthless because I have a can of red paint in the shed.

http://structureandimagery.blogspot.com/2011/10/rothko-red.html
It's Guest's round

Offline greypoint

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1041
Re: 4.3million dollars for this
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2011, 02:58:36 PM »
Well....obviously something is 'worth' what someone else will pay for it. The art world discover a new genius and their work rockets in price. Most of us who are not part of the art world shake our heads in disbelief - but we are philistines who don't get it - twas ever thus... Van Gogh etc.etc..  I like the Rothkos a lot as a concept just not sure if they're something I'd pay millions for....supposing i had millions  :-\

Offline Graham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1543
Re: 4.3million dollars for this
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2011, 03:37:37 PM »
  Well. Disregarding what someone paid for it which surely is just an irrellevant aside. As a pic I quite like it, and I'm sure I'd like it a whole lot more If I could see a really good print  8 feet wide.
             Graham.  :legit:
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. 

My Gallery
My Flickr Pics

Offline Graham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1543
Re: 4.3million dollers for this
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2011, 03:42:19 PM »
Um yeah.  So all of these pictures are worthless because I have a can of red paint in the shed.

http://structureandimagery.blogspot.com/2011/10/rothko-red.html

   If no one will pay for them , then yes, they'er worthless (Financially).



  And I don't believe you have a tin of red paint in the shed.............Thinking about, I'm not even sure you've got a shed!
                       Graham. :)
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day.
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. 

My Gallery
My Flickr Pics

Offline Jonathan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1273
    • PeopleByRyan
Re: 4.3million dollars for this
« Reply #14 on: November 12, 2011, 06:17:49 PM »
If you haven't heard/seen it already then check out this story - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/entertainment-arts-13785393

Short version: there's a painting which 99+% of the artworld reckons is a Monet.  2 brothers reckon it isn't.  If they agreed it was, it would be worth (literally) millions - as it is the owner paid £40,000 and most people reckon that's too much.

So....almost nobody on earth can tell that it's not a Monet.  But it's worth a small fraction of what a Monet would be.

Yes, it matters that this picture was taken by Gursky.  In the same way it matters whether it was Rothko who sloshed the red paint around.

There was a program ages ago about how "experts" and in particular the Saatchi gallery set the price for art.  They decide Damien Hirst's shartk is worth £50,000 - and all of a sudden it is.  3 days ago, Gursky had only taken the 3rd most expensive photograph ever.  Now he's number 1.  And I bet the price of his next print of 99 cent II Diptychon has just gone up too.

Oh and I have a shed.  2 actually.  And one of them's huge.
It's Guest's round

 

latest Posts

Subject Board Views/Replies Member Date & Time
xx Drone General Discussion 209/12 Jediboy Last post July 05, 2020, 09:22:26 PM
xx 1Dx Mk3 DSLR Cameras 1354/21 anglefire Last post July 05, 2020, 07:40:11 PM
xx Happiness is.... Entry Thread 05/07/20 - 12/07/20 International Weekly Comp Entries 32/0 Jediboy Last post July 05, 2020, 02:13:42 PM
xx Happiness is.... Chat Thread 05/07/20 - 12/07/20 International Weekly Comp Entries 29/0 Jediboy Last post July 05, 2020, 02:12:34 PM
xx POLL-LOUD International Weekly Comp Entries 225/4 Hinfrance Last post July 05, 2020, 08:17:39 AM
xx What made you feel good today General Discussion 591766/3913 anglefire Last post July 03, 2020, 08:24:05 PM
xx Potato - CHAT 27/06-5/07/20 International Weekly Comp Entries 234/6 Oldboy Last post July 01, 2020, 11:52:16 AM
xx Potato - ENTRIES 27/06-5/07/20 International Weekly Comp Entries 72/1 jinky Last post June 30, 2020, 07:16:09 PM