• Welcome to Camera Craniums: The Photography Community for Enthusiasts.
 

Recent Posts

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 62,507
  • Total Topics: 5,734
  • Online today: 3,050
  • Online ever: 3,332 (December 26, 2025, 05:27:02 PM)
Users Online
  • Users: 0
  • Guests: 802
  • Total: 802
  • Google (AdSense)
  • Google
  • Baidu (3)
Wish
Canon kit to borrow (free...Dreaminess Happy Christmas 2025!NiceVeedi 2-Pack Photogra...DJI Osmo Action 6 Essenti...RØDE Wireless ME Ultra-co...NEEWER Snap On ND Filter ...What made you feel good t...BRDRC Pocket 3 Camera Bik...Lenovo LOQ | 15.6 inch Fu...DJI Mic 3 (2 TX + 1 RX + ...DJI Mic Mini (2 TX + 1 RX...DJI OSMO Action 5 Pro 4 3...DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro Adv...Post your best shots hereAilun Tripod Phone Mount ...

RAW??????

Started by Jediboy, January 07, 2014, 04:34:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

SimonW

I have just bought it too, for the same reasons. And on special offer (only till tomorrow) much cheaper than the latest Elements. It seems great so far, with enough tools that I'll probably only go to ELements if I need to use layers -ie. hardly ever.
Simon Warren
(in Dunning, Scotland)

donoreo

I use the Nik software (Silver Efex, HDR Efex, etc) more than I do Elements. 

DigiDiva

Just bought Feb's DC Mag today and theres a good piece about Raw Jediboy, that may interest you.
Please visit my website @ www.sunderlandwallart.com

Jediboy

Thanks Chris,I'll take a look.
No chance to even touch the camera yet this weekend.  :'(
May the Force be with you.

Chris

SimonW

I'm curious. My understanding was that a RAW file could not be printed, and certainly my Adobe Camera Raw has no print option - I need to first open the image in Elements (or Lightroom). And of course ACR applies its own default settings as it opens the raw file, so I cannot ever see my original file. How then does AP magazine print "the original raw file with no processing applied", as for example on page 55 of the 4th January 2014 issue?
Simon Warren
(in Dunning, Scotland)

donoreo

They convert it to tif or jpg without any processing of colour, sharpness, etc. 

DigiDiva

#21
Donoreo, your avitar is very mean and moody! Good iamge.
Please visit my website @ www.sunderlandwallart.com

Andrew

Have pretty much used RAW since I had a computer powerful enough to use it (started digital in 2003 with 5mp and computer processing wasn't affordable until Xmas 2005).
The beauty for me, as has been said - is the amount of experimentation you can do with no loss to the orginal file.
The other big benefit was swapping over to Lightroom - it loves to work with RAW files - whilst providing a nice catalogue of images.

The only real down side to workign with RAW is that once you start to realise you can experiment with no loss to the original file and just wipe it and start again - you can start to spend a bit too much time experimenting, and not enough time actually taking and presenting pictures  :uglystupid2:
1 body, 1 lens, 1 flash gun, 1 tripod, 1 cable release & 1 filter. Keeping it simple!
(I lied, just got a second lens!)

donoreo

Quote from: DigiDiva on January 12, 2014, 03:30:29 PM
Donoreo, your avitar is very mean and moody! Good iamge.
That was my self portrait entry for DCW Weekend Competition about a year or so ago :) 

Reinardina

Started shooting RAW, combined with Jpeg, just in case.

This is my first RAW edited shot.

__________________
Reinardina.

Beauty is bought by judgment of the eye.
Shakespeare. (Love's Labours Lost.)

Beaux Reflets

Quote from: Reinardina on January 15, 2014, 08:48:28 AM
Started shooting RAW, combined with Jpeg, just in case.

This is my first RAW edited shot.



Nice shot  :tup: How well does it compare with the Jpeg version with the camera you are using ?
:beer: Andy

"Light anchors things in place and gives perspective meaning."

The choices we make are rooted in reflection.

http://beauxreflets.blogspot.com/

Jediboy

I agree, great shot.
And how did it compare tote JPEG?
Did you find it easy to edit the RAW?
May the Force be with you.

Chris

Reinardina

As requested, the (unedited) JPEG version of my 'Halo' shot.

To be honest, I have not compared them myself yet.

And I did not find it easy to edit it, as it is so totally different. Mind you, I had my tutor sitting next to me, which made things very clear and easy to understand. The way he explained everything made total sense. After he left, I had a go on my own, and realised I had already forgotten half of his wise words!

It is basically a matter of sliding the sliders and see what it does to the image. I will persevere, at least for a while, as it is probably a matter of getting used to it.

I did the editing in E11 by the way. If I become a 'RAW enthusiast' I will have to get Lightroom, I've been told.

Jpeg


RAW


__________________
Reinardina.

Beauty is bought by judgment of the eye.
Shakespeare. (Love's Labours Lost.)

Hinfrance

#28
Quote from: Reinardina on January 15, 2014, 12:06:13 PM

If I become a 'RAW enthusiast' I will have to get Lightroom, I've been told.


No you won't have to do anything. The basic ACR in Elements along with RAW Therapee was all I used for years. After that I bought Aftershot Pro*, which I still use for RAW editing - the Nostalgia plugin is just brilliant for black and white; I have had LR only since version 4* came out and I really don't use it much for editing as I find its 'global' and no layers approach to an image very restrictive. It is, however, a very good asset manager. Since I got the discounted deal on Photoshop CC I tend to use the full ACR that's in there, and then Nik* or Topaz*, rather than LR.

*All of the licences bought when they were at least 50% off :)
Howard  My CC Gallery
My Flickr
The theory seems to be that as long as a man is a failure he is one of God's children, but that as soon as he succeeds he is taken over by the Devil. H.L Mencken.

SimonW

Hi H,

Lightroom 5 isn't just for global adjustments. It has very effective local adjustments including red eye and spot healing, and a very effective graduated filter with variable width and tilt, enabling control of brightness, highlights and shadows, contrast, saturation etc. Also a similar radial filter, local adjustment brushes which do all those things rather than just dodge/burn. I've never used version 4 but guess 5 must be quite a bit more comprehensive. I'm still learning it but suspect I'll hardly ever need Elements now.

Simon
Simon Warren
(in Dunning, Scotland)

This website is proudly hosted on Crocweb Cloud Website Hosting.


Camera Craniums is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Program. This affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on Amazon.