LR 3.2 available

[picsfor]

http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Lightroom_3.2

the above is a link to LR3.2. This is a RC and will install alongside your LR3 and not over ride it.
It fixes several of the initial bugs and hopefully (hopes Adobe) fixes the memory issue that makes LR3 almost unusable for many people with more than a few hundred pictures in their catalogue.

[spinner]

http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Lightroom_3.2

the above is a link to LR3.2. This is a RC and will install alongside your LR3 and not over ride it.
It fixes several of the initial bugs and hopefully (hopes Adobe) fixes the memory issue that makes LR3 almost unusable for many people with more than a few hundred pictures in their catalogue.

Never upgraded to LR3, but they never fixed the memory issue relating to deleting photos, despite the promises. That experience of mine and what you posted the other day are keeping me far away from LR.

[Colin]

I must be lucky I have over 25000 in my catalogue and don't have a problem BUT I did with the beta.

[Forseti]

This is a RC and will install alongside your LR3 and not over ride it.

Oops Andrew

Working with Lightroom 3.2

                 • Mac: The Mac Lightroom 3.2 release candidate can be installed alongside Lightroom 3.0.

   • Windows: By default, this Lightroom 3.2 release candidate will remove or overwrite your existing Lightroom 3.0 installation. If you wish to return to Lightroom 3.0 after installing Lightroom 3.2, simply  reinstall Lightroom 3.0 from your original download after uninstalling Lightroom 3.2 using the Windows add/remove program utility.

[Jonathan]

Yeah Macs are a lot more forgiving of having multiple versions of the same program installed....

I would definitely install it if I was having problems but LR 3 is running great for me so I'll wait until the release.

BTW Scott Kelby had an unintentionally hilarious piece the other day begging Adobe to make LR "more like Aperture".  I guess it was easier than asking Apple to make Aperture work.....

[picsfor]

Yes, i admit it - i forgot to read fully on the Windows set up...

Thank you for correcting me gaff.

and as an extra - it does seem like my iMac is working much more efficiently under this RC for 3.2 update.