• Welcome to Camera Craniums: The Photography Community for Enthusiasts.

Recent Posts

Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 62,512
  • Total Topics: 5,735
  • Online today: 476
  • Online ever: 6,071 (March 12, 2026, 03:28:52 AM)
Users Online
  • Users: 0
  • Guests: 88
  • Total: 88
  • Google (AdSense) (2)
aliexpress
Weekly CompetitionsCanon kit to borrow (free...Dreaminess Happy Christmas 2025!NiceVeedi 2-Pack Photogra...DJI Osmo Action 6 Essenti...RØDE Wireless ME Ultra-co...NEEWER Snap On ND Filter ...What made you feel good t...BRDRC Pocket 3 Camera Bik...Lenovo LOQ | 15.6 inch Fu...DJI Mic 3 (2 TX + 1 RX + ...DJI Mic Mini (2 TX + 1 RX...DJI OSMO Action 5 Pro 4 3...DJI Osmo Action 5 Pro Adv...Post your best shots here

Taking a serious look at my equipment.

Started by Geoff I, December 17, 2011, 10:25:20 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Geoff I

I have started to change my lenses for the good I hope, I have just changed my 55-200 VR for a Tamron 70-300 VC hopefully that will give me more sharp images, but the next lens is giving me a lot of grief, I am thinking of changing my 18-105VR lens, I am finding this lens a little soft all the way through the focal lengths, but just wondering what to change it with, I have a short list with the Sigma 17-70mm OS or the Nikon 16-85, I have also a Sigma 50mm for general macro use, even further down the line I am thinking of getting the Sigma 10-20mm for street and landscape photography.

I hope someone can help me with the everyday lens and which one to go for.

Oldboy

I would go for the Sigma 17-70mm F2.8-F4 OS. All who have used it say it's a cracking lens.  :tup:

greypoint

I've used both the non OS versions of the Sigma 17-70 and can thoroughly recommend it. There is a bit of distortion at 17mm but I always found that quite fun. It can get amazingly close to the subject -almost touching - which, again, can give you some interesting shots. Some sample snaps with different cameras:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/greypoint/sets/72157621647506018/

Good luck with the Tamron. I've been using one for a few months and find it stands up very well in comparison with the Nikon VR. If only they did it in Pentax fit I'd be very happy!  :dance:
:dance:

spinner

A friend lent me the Sigma 10-20 mm. I loved it so much I bought my own, highly recommend it.
And more, much more than this, I did it my way
Ol' blue eyes

http://ddsdigita4.wix.com/ddsdigital
https://www.flickr.com/photos/spin498/

bones615

Have you looked at the sigma 24-70 f2.8, if you are getting the 10-20 its another option. I have one but it has a small amount of front focus so check it out first It was highly recommended when i was looking to replace my kit lens.

Simon

Alfonso_Frisk

#5
Quote from: Geoff I on December 17, 2011, 10:25:20 AM
I have started to change my lenses for the good I hope, I have just changed my 55-200 VR for a Tamron 70-300 VC hopefully that will give me more sharp images, but the next lens is giving me a lot of grief, I am thinking of changing my 18-105VR lens, I am finding this lens a little soft all the way through the focal lengths, but just wondering what to change it with, I have a short list with the Sigma 17-70mm OS or the Nikon 16-85, I have also a Sigma 50mm for general macro use, even further down the line I am thinking of getting the Sigma 10-20mm for street and landscape photography.

I hope someone can help me with the everyday lens and which one to go for.

Have a looksy in the follwing section of the site
http://cameracraniums.com/forum/index.php?board=61.0
Some user reviews/feedback on lenses there  :tup:
RR
Alf
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/nosmo_king2007
http://www.seateamimages.com/search.php
Wine improves with age, The older I get the more I like it.

Beryl

A true friend is the best possession

My Web site
http://berylladd.com/
Oh . And thanks for looking in

Mick

Quote from: Beryl on December 17, 2011, 02:37:41 PM
I had a looksy but it's off limits to me

Don't worry Beryl, it's off limits to me too. And I'm the admin.  :uglystupid2:
Thank You, "Guest" For Reading This Post.

YouTube

Alfonso_Frisk

Quote from: admin on December 17, 2011, 02:56:16 PM
Quote from: Beryl on December 17, 2011, 02:37:41 PM
I had a looksy but it's off limits to me

Don't worry Beryl, it's off limits to me too. And I'm the admin.  :uglystupid2:

Eddited the link and it should be ok now
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/nosmo_king2007
http://www.seateamimages.com/search.php
Wine improves with age, The older I get the more I like it.

Mick

Thanks Alf.  Dunno where that extra character came from in you link, :beer:  but hey, all OK now.  :tup:
Thank You, "Guest" For Reading This Post.

YouTube

Colin

I would also recommend the Sigma 17-70, I have only just replaced mine after about three years with a Canon L which was 3 times the price but realistically not 3 times the quality.

Beryl

Quote from: Alfonso_Frisk on December 17, 2011, 03:00:54 PM
Quote from: admin on December 17, 2011, 02:56:16 PM
Quote from: Beryl on December 17, 2011, 02:37:41 PM
I had a looksy but it's off limits to me

Don't worry Beryl, it's off limits to me too. And I'm the admin.  :uglystupid2:

Eddited the link and it should be ok now

That's good to know. Obviously a an error of some sort  ;D
A true friend is the best possession

My Web site
http://berylladd.com/
Oh . And thanks for looking in

michaelb104

I'd say go with the Sigma 17-70, since I got the lens I hardly ever take it off the camera, for the price it cannot be bettered (according to me).
Mike
 
My Flickr   .   My Fluidr

This website is proudly hosted on Crocweb Cloud Website Hosting.


Camera Craniums is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Program. This affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on Amazon.