• Welcome to Camera Craniums: The Photography Community for Enthusiasts.
 
Members
Stats
  • Total Posts: 62,412
  • Total Topics: 5,705
  • Online today: 61
  • Online ever: 856 (January 21, 2020, 09:07:00 AM)
Users Online
  • Users: 0
  • Guests: 45
  • Total: 45
7ds
Temu £100 Coupon bundle o...Amazon Spring Deal: SanDi...🌸🌼 Get Ready to Blossom w...Marantz Professional MPM-...Google Pixel 7a and Pixel...JasmineSanDisk Ultra 64GB USB Fl...SanDisk 512GB Extreme PRO...GiaDo You Shoot Photos With ...Which eye do you use with...SanDisk 256GB Extreme PRO...Duracell Plus Alkaline 1....RØDE VideoMicro Compact O...I must be one of the rare...Learning Resources

to IS or not to IS

Started by soltek, May 25, 2008, 05:31:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

soltek

Now that i have the 40d with the 17/85 is usm, i am already looking for another lens maybe the 70/300 IS lens.
What bothers me is the price over £350 for the lens  , i know in lens terms this is the cheap end of the market,i can get the non IS version for a lot less. the problem is sharpness and camera shake now i can, i know use a faster shutter speed or a tripod to combat this but don't want i use either really.

My question is this, i have read many a quote saying that people that have used this lens, that it  is ok used hand held at lower shutter speeds but the problem accures at low light you do need the tripod. Can you really use this sort of lens the non IS version Hand held without camera shake spoiling the photo in normal conditions ???

Carlj

Some people have to pay for stabilisation? Are they mad?  :doh:

Seriously, can't comment on non-stabilised, as all my lenses come with it as standard. But, and this may be relevant, 99% of my shots are handheld, many at speeds considered unworkable, and still get great results. As you push towards 300mm, it'll be worth the investment.

soltek

i think i will go for the 70/300 IS and possibly the prime 50m [nifty fifty] i have heard it called, and sometime in the far future get L series .
I have no specific area of photograghy i like to try my hand at anything, except nudes ofcourse, erhemm !! lol. :D
so before the end of the year i should have the
17/85 IS usm
50 prime
70/300 IS
:)


Tripod

The quick answer from me would be.........go for IS every time and if possible L series lenses.

Then again I'm 70 and trying to keep control lol.

guest4

Got to say I've also found IS to be a godsend. Sell your Canons and buy a proper camera with IS in the body  ;D  :legit:

soltek


Quote
] Sell your Canons and buy a proper camera with IS in the body

the problem with that is ,that at full zoom you can't see the image properly when trying to manual focus ,it's all over the place , or so i heard  :P. The camera still stabilizes the image though, but  i prefer to see it in the lens
:legit:   :beer:   :tup: when i can afford one ofcourse :(

Carlj

Have never had that problem, mind you, it could be alcohol that causes that effect....  :beer:

soltek

 :D So carrying a tripod instead of a box of stella on photo shoots would solve the problem then ;) if it does then my perception that i take great photos has gone out the window   :hehe:

oRGie

Quote from: soltek on June 18, 2008, 01:44:07 PM
:D So carrying a tripod instead of a box of stella on photo shoots would solve the problem then ;) if it does then my perception that i take great photos has gone out the window   :hehe:

lmao :)

Camera Craniums is a participant in the Amazon EU Associates Program. This affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to products on Amazon.